I am so confused with the Ms. Fluke situation, I have no clue what is going on. Limbaugh says she is asking taxpayers to pay for her contraceptives; but then I read that she (as a customer) was actually asking her private insurance to cover them and not the Government, which is her right as a customer to ask from a private company. But the, if it is a private business issue, I don't understand why is the Federal Government getting involved?
Then I also read that most private insurance cover Viagra, is this why medical bills are so expensive? is it because Insurers can't pay for them because the insurance pool money is being used to pay for Viagra pills?
I also read that this all started when the federal government added the free-contraceptives requirement to insurance carries as part of the Universal health care plan. I still remember during the health care debate a few years ago, Hillary Clinton was asked how the plan was going to protect itself from bankruptcy by the people who burn their livers with one Gin a day. Hillary explained that the plan's goal was to help the typical working class family who could not afford to pay for their child's cancer treatment. who could say 'no' to that? I actually think that is a very good intention. But then, what $30-month contraceptives and Viagra have to do with that noble goal? If a a person can't afford that, should not a good Socialist Government have the person's best interest in mind and force them to do something else with their spare time? like learning a job skill that would help them get a higher paid job or making them work a second job?
Then I also read that most private insurance cover Viagra, is this why medical bills are so expensive? is it because Insurers can't pay for them because the insurance pool money is being used to pay for Viagra pills?
I also read that this all started when the federal government added the free-contraceptives requirement to insurance carries as part of the Universal health care plan. I still remember during the health care debate a few years ago, Hillary Clinton was asked how the plan was going to protect itself from bankruptcy by the people who burn their livers with one Gin a day. Hillary explained that the plan's goal was to help the typical working class family who could not afford to pay for their child's cancer treatment. who could say 'no' to that? I actually think that is a very good intention. But then, what $30-month contraceptives and Viagra have to do with that noble goal? If a a person can't afford that, should not a good Socialist Government have the person's best interest in mind and force them to do something else with their spare time? like learning a job skill that would help them get a higher paid job or making them work a second job?
Comments